It was a lot like this.
(Click pic for animation.)
The first fully automatic firearm I ever put through it’s paces was an M3 Grease Gun.
Found the pic at this truly excellent article about the firearm at Guns.com. Click that mouse if you want the lowdown on the design.
How was it? Amazing! Slow rate of fire, easily controllable, just a blast to shoot. Not particularly accurate, but it is a submachine gun! And an old one at that!
What was my second full auto experience? The same gentleman who owned the M3 stepped back from the shooting bench and let me try my hand with his Uzi.
Another old gun. This one had been manufactured about 1960 or so, and had the wooden stock instead of the folding wire stock. Don’t ask me where he had gotten his hands on it.
So how was it? After the M3 it was kind of meh, actually. Can’t really say why. It was more accurate than the M3, significantly so, and had a faster cyclic rate.
Maybe that was why I wasn’t too keen. The Uzi burned through the magazine faster, so I had less fun time before running out of gun food.
Maybe try an American 180.
Sure it has a high rate of fire, but it uses 22lr.
Boy, do I just WISH I had one of those! It is the only full auto gun I have ever heard of that I could afford to shoot!
It looks awesome, indeed.
We’re allowed these, but being only semi-auto it’s not going to be as fun:
Glad you had fun. I remember back in the day when the buzz was that the Uzi was the best SMG in the world.
And while I’ve never fired an M3, I did once briefly get to handle an M3A1. I have always wondered if the M3, especially the M3A1, was developed to make us Brits feel good about the Sten. -g-
Doesn’t the M3 take .45s? The Uzi, 9mms? .45s got to be more fun.
” .45s got to be more fun.”
They were! More expensive, too.
I once had a chance to test out a HK MP5. That was a blast!